Evaluation

To evaluate the organization and the team separately, I defined a few minimum requirements for each and graded each one, from 0 to 5 (being 5 the highest grade). In the end I calculated the average between the requirements' grades and gave a final grade to the use case and the team. The total is the average between the use case and team grades.

Final grade

Organizations (ICO built on Stellar) Use case evaluation Team evaluation Total
Sure Remit 4.3 / 5 4 / 5 4.15 / 5
ZED currency 3.7 / 5 4 / 5 3.85 / 5
Mobius network 3.8 / 5 3.8 / 5 3.8 / 5
Smartlands 4.7 / 5 3 / 5 3.9 / 5
Pedity 2.7 / 5 1.3 / 5 2 / 5
HTKN 3.8 / 5 4.3 / 5 4 / 5
Heir 4.5 / 5 3.8 / 5 4.2 / 5
Paket 3.6 / 5 2.5 / 5 3 / 5
Scopuly 2.8 / 5 2.8 / 5 2.8 / 5
Woolf 3.4 / 5 3.5 / 5 3.5 / 5

General Requirements

Use case evaluation Primary mission Tokens sold Whitepaper content Product's potential Token's need Token's utility
Sure Remit 5 5 4 4 4 4
ZED currency 5 - 3.5 4 3 3
Mobius network 5 5 3 4 3 3
Smartlands 5 5 4 5 5 4.5
Pedity 3.5 - 2.5 3.5 2 2
HTKN 4 5 3 3 4 4
Heir 5 - 4.5 5 4 4
Paket 4 - 2.5 3.5 4 4
Scopuly 2.5 - 2.5 2 3 4
Woolf 4 - 4.5 2.5 3 3

Team Requirements

Team members' evaluation Description of each Previous experiences Quantity of ICOs to fundraise
Sure Remit 3 4 5
ZED currency 3 5 4
Mobius 4 5 2.5
Smartlands 3.5 2.5 3
Pedity 0 0 4
HTKN 4 4 5
Heir 2.5 4 5
Paket 4 3.5 0
Scopuly 2.5 2 4
Woolf 3 5 2.5